Saturday, December 5, 2009

09-12-05 Kozinski Fraud and Kozinski Culture were the true problems - The solution? It's the comptuers, %&$#$@!


Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:12:43 -0800
To: "Bonnie Russell" , "Laura Lynn"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Kozinski Fraud - and Kozinski Culture were the true problems - The solution? IT'S THE COMPUTERS, %&$#$@!
Cc:

Hi Bonnie, Hi Laura Lynn, hi all:
My background was primarily in science, so I could surely see all the deficiencies Bonnie sees in web sites where anybody could rate judges, or enter opinions substantiated or not, and anecdotal episodes.

In support of feedback web sites:
However, I can also see why Laura Lynn sees in them an important instrument. These sites are the counter measure against the deviant culture now prevailing in the courts and elsewhere - that judges are entitled to be corrupt, and also entitled to have it never talked about.
A subset of this culture are the various perversions, of processes and procedures ranging from complaints of judicial corruptions all the way to caption designations in courts of appeals.
What sense could it ever make to participate in a procedure where you are not allowed to name the offender?
It is a violation of due process off the bat... Rules of Court must dictate the procedure for designating captions. Period. But attorneys accept the current conditions as a dogma, possibly the outcome of some revelation...
These site are important psychologically - in breaking such barriers.

However, when it comes to scientific, verifiable, fully quantitative measurement of corruption:
I proposed the definitive project to the Office of Attorney General
Michael Mukasey about a year and a half ago. No response was received whatsoever, Senator Dianne Feinstein and Congresswoman Diane Watson followed up with Congressional Inquiries. The proposal was apparently scary enough that it prompted alleged fraudulent, derogatory responses by Kenneth Kaiser (Assistant Director, FBI), and Kenneth Melson (Director, Office of U.S. Atty General).
My request was never presented as addressing directly the corruption issue. It was simply a request for
Equal Protection - enforcement of Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978) in LA County.
I believe that we are rather unique in LA County - for about a decade the court denied access to registers of actions (
California dockets), including denial of access to parties and counsel in litigations, both civil and criminal. Likewise, access was also denied to Calendar of the Courts, Index of All Cases, and Index of Judgments. It was and is a serious abuse of Human, Civil, and Constitutional Rights of all 10 millions who reside in LA County.
The data is all computerized. I proposed that a
Special Counsel, with limited scope of mission and limited time for his tenure, could restore public access, at least on court locations, almost overnight. However, I cautioned, that FBI must no be involved. It had to be accomplished using units of the Treasury Dept, who were trained in capturing computers of failing banks.
I could guarantee, the once access was allowed, if I were provided a team of 10 smart programmers, and minimal budget, we could compose an index, reliable, reproducible, and validated, and rank all 425 or 450 judges (whatever the number is) of the
Los Angeles Superior Court on such Corruption Index within 60 days. No 200 investigators and 2-years with no final report... 60 days! The output would be a list of all judges, with their ranks on the Index, with easy reference to the makeup of the index, and the specific data that led to the ranking of each judge.
Such data should of course be later reviewed by others, independent reviewers, and amended as deemed necessary, and actions could be taken based on such data with minimal delays.
It's all there, and that was exactly why access was denied...
And that was also the reason that senior officers of the U.S. Dept of Justice found it necessary to make up fraudulent derogatory responses to U.S. congress, to justify their denial of equal protection.
That's the beauty of the Kozinski Frauds, which are the most common abuse of justice in the U.S. today;
To paraphrase the War Room battle cry: It's the computers, %&$#$@!
Joe Zernik
P.S. The same could also be of course applied in each and every U.S. Distinct court and each and every court of appeals, with minimal effort and maximal impact - the most bang for the buck!
- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


CC:
1) Prof Posner
[]
2) Various Law School faculty
3) USDOJ-IG Glenn A Fine, as an addendum to complaint against senior officers of the USDOJ, who provided alleged fraudulent responses to U.S. Congress in Aug/Sept 2008, and refused to provide equal protection for 10 millions LA county residents.
4) U.N. High Commissioner on Human Rights
5) Basel Accords Committee
[]
IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!
[]
"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

At 23:07 04/12/2009, Bonnie Russell wrote:
And you get what you pay for. The problem with "free" is content is verification, and what's missing. No case numbers, no "experts" or opposing counsel. Not knocking it per se, but seriously. Free sites are - more blathering. So you get what you pay for. Also, reporters find stuff more credible if someone puts their money where their mouth is. It's just the way it is. Not saying it's a total a bust, but seriously, if nothing is verifiable...what's the point?
----- Original Message -----
From: Laura Lynn
To:
Cc:
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: Kozinski Fraud - and Kozinski Culture were the true problems - seeing no wrong and no offense in perpetrating the routine fraud in the courts
Or rate judges on www.Courthouseforum.com for free.
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, Bonnie Russell <brussell1@san.rr.com> wrote:
From: Bonnie Russell <brussell1@san.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Kozinski Fraud - and Kozinski Culture were the true problems - seeing no wrong and no offense in perpetrating the routine fraud in the courts
To:
Cc:
Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 9:18 PM
You nailed it, Jon. Exactly why USAjudges.com exists. Make a report, make a difference. Enough reports, reporters get interested and boom; another Luzerne County.
However Jon, most people prefer to spend their time railing against the system, or authoring reams of papers proving how "right" they are, than act.
It's really kind of strange.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Roland
To: Laura Lynn
Cc:
Sent:
Friday, December 04, 2009 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: Kozinski Fraud - and Kozinski Culture were the true problems - seeing no wrong and no offense in perpetrating the routine fraud in the courts

A Lawyer’s View of the Justice System, Joseph H. Delaney, July/August, 1999, issue of Analog Science Fiction and Fact, Vol. CXVIX No. 7 & 8 ”... the proportion of judges who are dishonest, who are on the take, who harbor prejudices against parties or counsel, is far greater than the lay public realizes. ... Corruption is rampant in courts at every level throughout the country. It is equally rampant among prosecutors and law enforcement people. ... The primary corrupting influence is the drug business. ... the dope interests own contemporary justice. ... There is no greater shock than to find that even with both law and the facts in your favor your constitutional rights are worthless because you can’t get the crooked regime to enforce them.”
http://www.constitution.org/abus/narc/lvjs.htm
If you don't want corrupt officials, stop voting for them. it's easy to spot them. They're the ones who get campaign donations. Only candidates without money should ever be voted for.



-- Jon      
-------------------------------------------------------------------Constitution Society 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322, Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001 www.constitution.org jon.roland@constitution.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

That's scary. Of corse, one solution would be simply ending the prohibition against drugs. Prohibition didn't work against booze, in fact it put Al Capone into power.

Al Capone: America's best known gangster and the single greatest symbol of the collapse of law and order in the United States during the 1920s Prohibition.

the collapse of law and order in the United States... Prohibition

Prohibition = the collapse of law and order in the United States...

Prohibition = the collapse of law and order...

Prohibition = collapse of law & order...

Prohibition = collapse of law & order...

Prohibition = collapse of law & order...


why would it work on drugs?