Thursday, November 12, 2009

09-11-12 Should Kenneth Kaiser and Kenneth Melson be deemed patronizers of racketeers?

What is posted here, is just a small fraction of what was filed with FBI in the past three years. I tried to focus here on schemes that repeat themselves over and over, in the cases of Judge David Yaffe relative to Richard Fine in Marina v LA County, in the case of Judge Connor in Samaan v Zernik, in the case of Sturgeon v LA County in the case of Judge John Segal in Galdjie v Darwish. in the case of Terry Friedman in Hanks v Woods. It is those schemed that you find repeated, that are the most convincing evidence of the conduct in a pattern of racketeering...

Los Angeles Superior Court
This is no Flim Flam
This is allegedly a full blown, well-established racket....Evidence is provided on these pages for (1) conduct (2) of an enterprise (3) through a pattern (4) of racketeering activity.
Such conduct pertains directly to the Human Rights of 10 millions who reside in Los Angeles County, and it also pertains directly to stability of financial markets in the U.S. and beyond...

Welcome to the

LA-JR!
(alleged LA-Judiciary Racket)

Alleged Specialty: Real estate fraud with high affinity towards financial institutions.
  1. It is alleged that the LA-JR closely colluded with Countrywide, and that the joint enterprise ended in collapse of Countrywide. You can't eat the cake and have it too...
  2. There is no way to explain consistent with public policy and the U.S. Constitution, the conduct of Senior U.S. Officers, who forced the merger of Bank of America Corporation with Countrywide and Merrill Lynch.
  3. Letter by NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, provided evidence for what was claimed by others to be criminal conduct by both the U.S. Officers and Bank of America Officers.
  4. Here it is claimed that credible, large volume evidence, demonstrated that the Legal Department of Countrywide was a corrupt organization well before the collapse, that U.S. agencies were fully informed, 5) Here it is claimed that effectively, through the merger, the Countrywide group took control of the office of General Counsel of Bank of America Corporation. The evidence is two fold:
a) The reports of the old General Counsel being led by security out of the builiding in the midst of negotiation with Merrill Lynch.
b) That the conduct of Bryan Cave, LLP, which is alleged to be essential racketeering, never ceased for one minute with the merger. However, resistance to it could be found in telephone conversations with senior staff of the office of General Counsel of Bank of America all the way to early 2009. That is claimed to be the reason that Bryan Cave- i.e. Sandor Samuels pressed for the court room false actions against me when I communicated with Bank of America.

The risk incurred to financial markets is unreasonable...
Sandy is now Associate General Counsel at BAC - streamlining as usual ...

Sandy Samuels
Sandor Samuels- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jacqueline Connor
Associate General Counsel- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - -Judge
Bank of America Corporation- - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LA Superior Court
Alleged Racketeer- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alleged Racketeer


Your best and brightest say that FBI refuses to perform its duties in order to protect alleged widespread corruption of the Los Angeles Judges...

We who live in Los Angeles, kindly request responses from FBI and U.S. Dept of Justice:
  • Why do FBI and U.S. DoJ patronize racketeering in the Los Angeles courts?
  • Why do FBI and US DoJ patronize racketeering in Countrywide, and now Bank of America
  • Why is there no indictment of Sandor Samuels?
  • Why is there no indictment of Jacqueline Connor?
Alleged deception by U.S. Dept of Justice and FBI in communications with U.S. Congress
  • In August -September 2008, the Hon Dianne Feinstein, Senator, and the Hon Diane Watson, Congresswoman, filed Congressional Inquiries on FBI and U.S. Dept of Justice, why they would not respond to my complaints about racketeering by the judges of the LA Superior Court?
  • The responses provided by the two officers whose photos appear above, were false and deliberately misleading.
  • The correspondence with congress is linked below.
  • Can anybody explain what justification Mr Melson and Mr Kaiser found for providing false and deliberately misleading responses to U.S. Congress?
Alleged long term denial of Equal Protection of the 10 millions who reside in Los Angeles County
  • The request was simple - restoration of the public's right to access court records - to inspect and to copy...
  • I never asked them to clean up the place either...
  • I realized it was too big a job. what I asked was simple, and it could be accomplished overnight....
  • Restore public access to public records... That would be enough...
Denial of access to court records is the direct cause of continued alleged severe abuse of Human Rights in the case of falsely imprisoned Atty Richard Fine:
  • Today- the LA Superior Court denies access to the Register of Action (California docket) in the case of the falsely imprisoned Richard Fine's case.
  • It is also clear why- that docket is likely to provide conclusive evidence of criminality by Judge David Yaffe.
Absent access to the docket, how could anybody consider reasonable the claims of honest judicial review, in court rulings that:
  • Richard Fine's jailing conformed with the fundamentals of the law...
  • Richard Fine's habeas corpus petition denied by U.S. Magistrate Carla Woehrle and U.S. Judge John Walter at the U.S. District Court... (took them 3 months to review)
  • Petition originating from the habeas corpus proceedings, was denied by the U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit... Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, and Circuit Judges Richard Tallman, and Richard Paez...
All of that was done, without ever producing the docket... I guess that is why Alex Kozinski is advertised as a brilliant jurist and a champion of civil rights... I have no legal education, but I cannot see how anybody could review a Habeas Corpus with no access to court records...they are inseparable...
  • Could anybody in the justice system explain how this habeas corpus worked with no docket?
  • And how did it happen that no attorney in Los Angeles dares open his/her mouth?
FBI denies Equal Protection, even when a highly decorated FBI veteran opined crimes were being perpetrated and recommended an immediate investigation.
  • Below is a letter by a highly decorated FBI veteran who opined that the LA Superior Court was engaged in real estate fraud, and recommended to initiate an immediate investigation...
  • Could anybody in the justice system explain what justification they have for allowing the judges of the LA Superior Court to continue the racketeering in this case in broad daylight?
  • Could anybody in the justice system explain why they deny a resident of LA County Equal Protection against racketeering by Sandor Samuels and Jacqueline Connor?
Denial of access to court records is direct cause of continued alleged severe abuse of Human Rights of all who reside in Los Angeles County:
  • The prospect of any integrity in court services in Los Angeles County is now held captive by the court in false ligiation of Sturgeon v LA County
  • As was shown in filing with the court itself, they derailed such litigation to the point that one cannot even tell who the judge is or was.
  • The way that such litigation is conducted cannot reasonably be considered consistent with the law.
  • The court is denying access to the Register of Actions of this litigation, which would be instrumental in providing the definitive evidence of perversion/obstruction of justice in that litigation.
Your best and brightest say that you are refusing to perform your duties to protect alleged widespread corruption of the Los Angeles Judges.
  • Below is an email from the same decorated veteran... explaining that FBI would not investigate because of the concern that the would uncover the widespread corruption of the Judges of the "Los Angeles Circuit" as he called it...



LINKED RECORDS

1) August 21, 2008 Email from James Wedick in re: Refusal of FBI to investigate.

2) Opinion Letter of FBI veteran James Wedick regarding real estate fraud perpetrated on Dr Zernik by the LA Superior Court.

3) August September 2008 Correspondence between U.S. Congress and FBI and U.S. Dept of Justice.

    We are looking for informed, educated votes. Please check the evidence first, and here is a link for racketeering in Wikipedia...

    SHOULD KENNETH KAISER AND KENNETH MELSON BE DEEMED
    PATRONIZERS OF RACKETEERS?
    Please vote by entering a comment below.
    __________________

    "This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of
    judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most
    serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society,"
    said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

    No comments: